![]() ![]() This alone could knock at least a few percent off CDNG's CPU usage. ![]() As a list of files, Windows, Mac OS, and Linux need to access each DNG in the folder individually which is more calls to the file systems driver and more short, potentially-fragmented reads from the hard drive. And like I had previously mentioned, storing it as one file removes some degree of file system overhead both in processing and storage. So that alone was viewed as being a hugely positive feature to a lot of people. … and one of the reasons that people were all over ProRes RAW before they even knew what it was capable of was because it was stored as a single file. Otherwise, where Andrew? Now, yes, I probably would like to license BRaw to put in a phone, but that may not happen for years, DNG is now, and I have been thinking of approaching DNG groups, and mobile chipset manufacturers to find the fastest DNG processing software and hardware for DNG on phones.Īndrew Kolakowski wrote:You can wrap DNG into MXF- this is not sorting much at all, though. The only real issue people go on about is processing speed, which we are talking about, but a. But DNG is there, is open source, is practical, and apparently is much better than BRaw 3:1 at 4:1 as far as detail. But life is life, I would like to do my own codec that dies lossless 10:1-100:1 on a denoused image, but I can't afford the patent costs to defend such a thing (costly court battles). We know you like cineform.we hear the crickets, I do to, and see your posts out there (at least I hope I'm talking to the right guy). You can wrap DNG into MXF- this is not sorting much at all, though. No on his interested in writing good DNG decoder either. It's outdated technology, used in video cameras basically just by BM. How long has DNG been in the open format domain without anybody doing that? Now it seems, that even BM, who introduced the only compressed variants, is moving away from it. Uli Plank wrote:Even if technically possible the question remains, if anybody is really interested in doing that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |